Back to Insights
Employee Benefits

Health Plan Renewal Costs Are Rising: What Employers Should Review Before Cutting Benefits

Conduit Bridge Team5 min read

Before accepting a health plan renewal or reducing benefits, employers should compare the full budget, employee costs, provider access and implementation requirements, then evaluate alternatives with qualified benefits advisers and a clear, documented decision process.

What should employers review before changing health benefits?

Compare the full annual budget, employer contributions, employee costs, provider networks, medication access and transition requirements. Use consistent enrollment assumptions and qualified benefits advisers. A lower employer contribution may simply shift costs to employees rather than reduce the total cost of coverage.

A health plan renewal puts finance and HR in the same difficult conversation: how much more can the business afford, and what would employees lose if the plan changes? The first response should be a comparison of the options, not an automatic increase in deductibles or employee contributions.

KFF's 2026 Employer Health Benefits Survey reported an average annual family premium of $28,303, up 5% from 2025. The full survey was completed by 1,937 nonfederal public and private firms with at least 10 workers. The $28,303 figure is the total premium, including employer and worker contributions, rather than the employer's share alone.[1]

It provides context for renewal discussions. It does not explain your renewal. Your enrollment, coverage, funding arrangement and contract terms need their own review.

Start with the full budget, not the headline increase

Ask your broker or benefits adviser to reconcile the current plan's actual spending with the renewal proposal. Use consistent enrollment assumptions and separate changes in price from changes in headcount or coverage elections.

For an insured plan, distinguish total premiums from the employer contribution. Identify administration, advisory and other fees paid outside the premium, without counting embedded charges twice. Employee payroll deductions belong in the comparison, but moving a cost onto payroll does not reduce the cost of coverage.

For a self-funded arrangement, premiums alone are not a useful budget measure. Qualified advisers should assess expected claims, administration fees, stop-loss costs, reserves and claims volatility, including what a worse-than-expected claims year could mean for cash flow. Do not treat a projected claims budget as a fixed price or assume self-funding is suitable for every employer.

The employee healthcare cost optimization article offers a related starting point. Renewal analysis needs to go further by comparing specific proposals and the consequences of each change.

Compare current coverage, renewal and an alternative

Consider this illustrative comparison, not a client example. An employer's current insured plan has annual premiums of $1.5 million: $1.2 million paid by the company and $300,000 by employees.

The renewal would bring total premiums to $1.65 million. Keeping the same contribution split would put the employer at $1.32 million and employees at $330,000.

An alternative proposal shows an employer contribution of $1.25 million. That looks less expensive to finance, but employees would contribute $400,000. Total premiums would still be $1.65 million. The employer's lower contribution would come from shifting responsibility, not reducing the premium.

If that alternative also raises deductibles, narrows the network or adds a separate administration fee, the contribution figures tell even less of the story. HR needs to explain the employee consequences while finance accounts for every budget component.

A comparable review should answer four questions:

  • What changes in the total annual budget, and what assumptions drive that change?
  • What changes in employer contributions and employee payroll deductions?
  • What changes in employees' likely out-of-pocket exposure and access to care?
  • What expenses and obligations arise during the transition?

Test the impact on employees and their families

A plan can look similar in a summary and function differently when a family needs care. Review deductibles, copayments, coinsurance and out-of-pocket limits together. Avoid judging a design by its deductible alone.

Ask whether employees' physicians, hospitals and specialists participate in the proposed network, particularly where employees live rather than only where the office is located. A network's size does not establish that a particular family's providers are included. Confirm participation through current sources and clarify continuity-of-care provisions with the carrier or administrator.

Medication access deserves a separate review. Compare formularies, pharmacy networks, specialty-drug arrangements, prior authorization requirements and any changes affecting ongoing prescriptions. Protect employee privacy when gathering information, and use the appropriate carrier or administrator channels rather than asking managers to collect medical details.

These checks may reveal acceptable tradeoffs. They may also show that a lower-priced plan would disrupt treatment or create costs employees cannot comfortably absorb. Neither conclusion belongs hidden in a premium comparison.

Evaluate who will administer the plan

Renewal is a reasonable time to review insurer, administrator and vendor options. Ask your broker to explain which alternatives were considered, why others were excluded and how compensation and fees differ.

Evaluate responsibilities as well as price. Who handles eligibility, billing discrepancies, claims questions, appeals and employee support? What reporting will the employer receive? Which services are included, and which require another contract or fee?

A new vendor should be assessed against these requirements, not simply its quote. Contract terms, funding decisions and compliance obligations warrant review by qualified benefits, legal and other advisers as appropriate.

Make the implementation plan part of the decision

As a planning suggestion, begin the review 90 to 120 days before renewal when practical. This is not a legal deadline; the right schedule depends on contracts, required notices, enrollment processes and the scope of the proposed change.

Before approving a switch, assign responsibility for employee communications, plan documents, applicable notices, enrollment data, payroll deductions and carrier or administrator setup. Confirm effective dates and procedures for resolving transition problems. Employees should understand what is changing before they must choose coverage.

Conduit Bridge Advisory can help employers frame the comparison and coordinate conversations with appropriate providers and qualified advisers. Explore our solutions, or schedule a consultation to discuss your renewal priorities before committing to a change.

Related Insights